A reply to the ''Review reviewed'' of the Rev

Date1867

Names

Canada Presbyterian Church (subject)

Inglis, David, 1825-1877 (subject)

Kemp, Alexander F. (Alexander Ferrie), 1822-1884 (author)

King, John M. (John Mark), 1829-1899 (subject)

Observer steam job office (publisher)

Format

Book

Notes

A reply to the ''Review reviewed'' of the Rev. D. Inglis, and a vindication of a ''Review of the state and condition of the Canada Presbyterian church since the union in 1861''. Printed in double columns.

Medium

Hardcover books

Language

English

CollectionBaldwin Collection of Canadiana

Usage Rights Public Domain (Learn More)

Call Number / Accession Number37131055296834D

Dewey Number285.1 K25.4 BR

Discover More

Reply...to the strictures on volume VIII of The history of Canada, in the Review of historical publications relating to Canada

1897

Examination of Thomas L. McKenney's Reply to the Review of his narrative, &c.

1847

Letter to the Hon. Francis Hincks, being a review of his reply to Mr. Howe's speech on The organization of the Empire

1855

Remarks on the Rev. Mr. Stanser's Examination of the Rev. Mr. Burke's Letter of instruction to the C.M. of Nova-Scotia, together with a reply to the R(...)

1805

Reply to A third letter of the Right Rev

1862

Camp-meeting, the reply of Spectator to the Rev

1863

A reply to A letter of the Rt. Rev. the Lord Bishop of Montreal and Metropolitan of Canada, addressed to the bishops and clergy of the united Church o(...)

1862

A reply to the Statement of the Rev

1851

First of seven volumes covering final report of LaMarsh Commission is reviewed by head commissioner Judy LaMarsh and colleagues Scott Young (left) and(...)

6/15/1977

Here is the guard of honor marching to the House, where they were reviewed by Lieutenant-Governor Albert Matthews

2/16/1945

Sailors reviewed before memorial--With the huge pylons of Canada's great memorial at Vimy towering in the background

8/5/1936

The Reviewer reviewed : Scrutator's (Mr. Peter Le Sueur's) incompetence, to perform the self-imposed duties of a critic, exposed

1856